Re: Substitution Of King Professor CJA Uwemedimo`s Name.
*How Professor Bankole Sodipo Forfeited
The Opportunity To Substitute King`s Name*
Content
(1.0)Introduction
(2.0)Contents of our Next Publication
(3.0) Conclusion.
(1.0)Introduction
(1.1) In fulfillment of Anti-Corrosive Vanguard`s mandate on information dissemination with respect to the level of progress accomplished by the Management of Comandclem Nigeria Limited towards the realization of royalties expected to be accrued from the unauthorized use of the patented invention of King Professor CJA Uwemedimo by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, the Publisher of The Patentees` Online News Paper considers it paramount to review the Supreme Court`s Proceedings between Comandclem Nigeria Limited and Mobil producing Nigeria Unlimited held on 23rd day of February, 2016.
(2.0) In the course of reviewing the rulings of the Supreme Court of Nigeria held on 23rd of February, 2016, The Publisher Of The Patentees` Online News Paper shall carry-out in-depth analyses on the Application for Substitution of Late King Professor CJA Uwemedimo (may his soul rest in peace) with Prince Reginould Uwemedimo filed by the Professor Of Patent Medicine Store, Professor Bankole Sodipo.
(2.0)Contents of our Next Publication
(2.1)In full realization of the fact that Late King Professor CJA Uwemedimo can neither sue or be sued in any court of competent jurisdiction except through substituted names from his family most especially Sons, on 3rd of November, Aiku Bamidele (SAN) (leading counsel employed by the king) said before the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court and I quote him verbatim.
“The second point that is pertinent is that the first appellant in the main appeal that was dismissed who is the first cross respondent in the cross appeal which my learned friend wishes to argue before your lordship this afternoon died on 18th of July, this year.
My lords, in that respect, it will be expedient in these circumstances to amend all the court`s processes before your lordship to reflect the substitution of the deceased, first appellant in the main appeal and the first cross respondent in the cross appeal”
Per: Aiku Bamidele (SAN)
Date: 03/11/2014
Position: The Leading Legal Counsel representing CCNL
Suit No: SC/69/2011
(2.3)Unfortunately, the Only One Surviving Director in CCNL, Queen Akon Uwemedimo, and the Only One Surviving Secretary in CCNL, Prince Reginould Uwemedimo were said to have debriefed this competent lawyer, Aiku Bamidele (SAN) and engaged the service of the Professor Of Patent Medicine Store, Professor Bankole Sodipo who forfeited the opportunity to substitute king`s name with his family members most especially Sons.
(2.4) In our next publication, Anti-Corrosive Vanguard`s shall review the follows issues.
(2.4.1)The Incompetency Of Professor Bankole Sodipo Exposed:
How Mobil admitted Paragraph 13 of the Amended Statement Of Claim with respect to the 1980 contract between King Professor CJA Uwemedimo and Mr. F. Hawkins, Mr. Tom Lafferty and Mr. G. Walker to defeat the weak arguments adduced by Professor Bankole Sodipo on application for substitution of name.
(2.4.2) The Weak Arguments Adduced By Professor Bankole Sodipo
“My lords, we humbly submit that it is necessary to substitute the name of Reginould Uwemedimo for CJA Uwemedimo as provided for in order 8, rule 9 (2) and (5) of the Supreme Court Rules Of 1985 As Amended”
(2.4.3)Ekaete Adiamiko, Daniel Adiamiko & Godswill Adiamiko Informed Supreme Court on the Traditions and Customs of Eket People as follows,
“We have one leadership and everyone must queue behind him. Nobody should come up with any idea of breaking our home by choosing two people to replace King (Prof.) Clement Adiamiko Uwemedimo in Court as this act is capable of breaking our family.”
Per: Ekaete, Daniel, Godswill Adiamiko
(2.4.4)The Application For The Substitution Of Reginould`s Name.
What are the legal interpretations of the ruling of Honourable Justice Galadima (JSC) on the substitution of name when the court said and I quote.
-“Cross appeal is a separate appeal on its own, it stands on its own. Cross appellant has the right to choose who to pursue in his cross appeal.”
- In summary, the application is incompetent and it is accordingly dismissed.
(2.4.5)Principle Of Privities Of Contract: Mobil Cannot Sue Reginuould Uwemedimo In Its Cross Appeal.
Applying the principle of privities of contract, Mobil never had any contract with Reginould Uwemedimo but CJA Uwemedimo in 1980.
Reginould Uwemedimo cannot sue Mobil and Mobil cannot sue Reginould Uwemedimo.
(2.4.6)How Mobil Admitted Paragraph 13 Of CCNL`s Amended Statement Of Claim Which Was Denied In Paragraph 13 Of The Amended Statement Of Defense To Forfeit Application For Substitution Of Name.
How Mobil confused Professor Bankole Sodipo easily by approbating and reprobating concurrently on the 1980 contract between King Professor CJA Uwemedimo and Mr. F. Hawkins, Mr. Tom Lafferty and Mr. G. Walker to dismiss the substitution of the king`s names.
Please, keep in view.
(3.0)Conclusion
(3.1) The Board of Directors will do everything legally to protect the investments of innocent patentees in the face of resistance from Queen Akon Uwemedimo, Prince Reginould Uwemedimo , Pastor Monday Obo Akpan and Professor Bankole Sodipo.
(3.2) Once more, we feel your pains, difficulties, and inconveniencies being encountered in recent times due to the unsolicited interference of Adiamiko Family with the administration of Comandclem Nigeria Limited.
(3.3) We appreciate your understanding in this regard as we are looking forward to 4th of April, 2016, for the hearing of the status quo application before Honourable Justice Ijeoma L. Ojukwu of the Federal High Court, Uyo Judicial Division.
(3.4) We shall not labour in vain. Amen.
Yusuf Nurudeen ( B. Sc., AAT, ACA)
- Patent Case Analyst.
- Marketing Manager.
4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos.
Hotlines:
Old Line, MTN - 0703-252-2248
New Line, Glo - 0905-765-5060
New Line, Etisalat - 0908-656-3131
No comments:
Post a Comment